ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP and Discardable (was Re: Lists "BCP" draft review)

2010-06-02 13:26:37
Scott Kitterman wrote:
"Dave CROCKER" <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:

  
On 6/2/2010 8:08 AM, Al Iverson wrote:
    
Agree. "Discard" and "silently discard" mean the same thing, in my
opinion. Though, I am guilty of using the phrase "silently discard."
Maybe in an attempt to be slightly over-specific.
      
I do not recall seeing a dictionary or technical definition of "discard" 
that 
says anything at all about whether the discarder says anything at all.

Taken on its own and without further technical specifications 'discard' does 
not 
direct, imply or request that the action be silent or noisy, and if noisy 
who 
gets to hear it.
    

IIRC, this is by design since there was no consensus around what exactly to 
do.  Personally, I tend to favor not having messages silently vanish.
  

+1

As stated before, I have not followed the entire discussion on ADSP in 
depth, so please bear with me. I could not find relevant items in the 
archives, but has there ever been suggested to have a 'rejectable' in 
addition to 'discardable' and 'all'?

/rolf

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>