On 11/Jan/11 20:15, John R. Levine wrote:
The new docs willuse the CORRECTED rfc4871bis text.
Considering how far along we are with rfc4871bis, and keeping mind mind
the objections from Jim and others, my inclination would be to finish and
publish rfc4871bis as a standalone document, and after that do the DOSETA
document that, as I understand it, pulls out components of DKIM and
defines interfaces to them as a toolkit.
+1, considering that the current rfc4871bis is the result of a merge,
publishing the intermediate step before a further split will ease
future comparisons (as they won't have to go down to draft records.)
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html