-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:21 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain
Identity"
44 pages of diffs.
Updating an RFC number causes a diff. That's not a valid metric.
These aren't updates to just the rfc number though. This document
has been changing and changing and changing up until the weeks
before last call, and through last call. It's impossible to keep up with
unless it is your full time job, which it most certainly isn't in my case --
unless you can figure out how this relates to public key substitution
attacks in android market in-app purchases.
That is why I'm so alarmed.
Ah, you deftly avoided my question:
You said:
I count at least two new normative changes -- in informational notes of
all places -- by scanning
*half* the document, both of which are wrong.
What were the two normative changes in informational notes that were wrong in
the half of the document you scanned?
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html