-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 10:29 AM
To: Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net; ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output summary - proposing ODID "Originating Domain
Identity"
It's because I didn't want to imply that those were the only two. It's just
what I found in my quick scan. But they were the advise about ignoring
signatures with sha1, and another saying you could ignore an l= *tag*.
I can't recall the history of the first one, other than it being consistent
with general IETF movement away from use of SHA1. Perhaps someone else can
comment there.
The advice that a verifier can ignore the "l=" tag was in RFC4871, so copying
it to RFC4871bis doesn't seem like a problem to me.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html