On 05/04/2011 10:25 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I count at least two new normative changes -- in informational notes
of all places -- by scanning
*half* the document, both of which are wrong.
What were the two normative changes in informational notes that were wrong in
the half of the document you scanned?
It's because I didn't want to imply that those were the only two. It's just
what I found in my quick scan. But they were the advise about ignoring
signatures with sha1, and another saying you could ignore an l= *tag*.
And that's what I found in 15 minutes.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html