In my experience, the reputation of the list is unrelated to the
reputation of its participants.
Given how little DKIM-related reputation work has been done, deployed and
heavily used so far, perhaps we should all be a bit cautious about taking
existing practices and treating them as definitive of future needs and uses.
In case it wasn't clear, I wasn't referring to DKIM reputation. I
whitelist mail from lists I'm subscribed to using List-ID or some
other bits of stable header text. In theory evil people could forge
them, in practice it's never been a problem. So having a DKIM
signature to be the stable text would be nice, but wouldn't
fundamentally change what I do already.
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html