Ned Freed writes:
I guess it would work - although it would probably trip loop detectors
too soon in some cases - but I don't think an appproach that
effectively calls for a message to lie about where it has been is a
good idea.
AOL. There aren't any RFCs that say "Don't insert inaccurate Received
fields", but it still seems to have very bad karma ;)
I think we need another mechanisms, probably header-based.
"Auto-Submitted: auto-generated" is defined in RFC 3834 section 5. 3834
orders autoresponders to be careful about incoming auto-submitted
messages. If similar language is added to the relevant sieve documents,
the result should be fine. At least in theory.
Arnt