RE: consensus call of RR prefix


Andrew Newton wrote:

Therefore, that leaves one under-discussed question: should a prefix be 
used to avoid collision with other records as one measure of preventing 
the requirement of DNS over TCP?


No.

Michael R. Brumm

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: consensus call of RR prefix, (continued) RE: consensus call of RR prefix, Michael R. Brumm RE: consensus call of RR prefix, william(at)elan.net RE: consensus call of RR prefix, terry RE: consensus call of RR prefix, william(at)elan.net Re: consensus call of RR prefix, David Blacka RE: consensus call of RR prefix, Max Kanat-Alexander Re: consensus call of RR prefix, Yakov Shafranovich Re: consensus call of RR prefix, Mark Lentczner Re: consensus call of RR prefix, william(at)elan.net Re: consensus call of RR prefix, william(at)elan.net RE: consensus call of RR prefix, Michael R. Brumm <= Re: consensus call of RR prefix, Ryan Ordway Re: consensus call of RR prefix, Ryan Ordway Re: consensus call of RR prefix, Yakov Shafranovich RE: consensus call of RR prefix, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: consensus call of RR prefix, Hallam-Baker, Phillip