Re: [openpgp] heads-up: re-chartering the OPENPGP WG2020-10-21 07:33:32Hiya, On 21/10/2020 13:01, Derek Atkins wrote: So... IF I read this right, the plan is to start from RFC4880 and then re-hash all the discussions we've had in the past decade+ to re-introduce changes to it? Urgh, no:-) Or is the plan to start from the current rfc4880bis draft and work from there to get it across the finish line? More or less. There will of course need to be a discussion about WG adoption of a draft but IIUC the goal will be for that to basically start from the current bis draft. What I don't know is whether or not there are parts in the current draft that a WG would rather not have and how that might affect people's opinions on adoption. I do believe a WG would want almost all of the bis text so starting from testing that (via a WG adoption discussion) seems like a plan to me. But again, that's getting a bit ahead of ourselves. The current wording in the charter leads me to the former and not the latter process. Can you please confirm? Feel free to suggest some words pointing out it's the latter. (Or I can try later on, if that's better.) Cheers, S. Thanks, -derek On Tue, October 20, 2020 9:20 pm, Stephen Farrell wrote:Hiya, The draft charter is at [1]. Comments and discussion of that are more than welcome. From my POV, I'm happy to try help out to get a fairly minimal bit of progress progressed (as an RFC) - if we can usefully succeed in that (which isn't a given). FWIW, I do think starting with a very modest goal is likely a good plan for now. A bit of success (in terms of an RFC that is implemented, deployed and more up to date) is already not that easy, but success does breed success so if we got that done, then extending the charter based on success is not so hard. Cheers, S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-openpgp/ On 21/10/2020 01:59, Ronald Tse wrote:I second Derek’s message here, haven’t seen a proposed charter at the mailing list? _____________________________________ Ronald Tse Ribose Inc.On Oct 21, 2020, at 8:55 AM, Derek Atkins <derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com> wrote: On Tue, October 20, 2020 8:44 pm, Ángel wrote:On 2020-10-20 at 14:59 -0700, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: Please welcome the chairs for the now-in-proposed-state WG, Daniel Kahn Gillmor and Stephen Farrell! Looking forward to many successful RFCs :) -BenNice to hear! Although I would be happy to see just a few for now :-)This is complete news to me; I have seen no proposed charter sent to this mailing list. Did I miss it? -derek -- Derek Atkins 617-623-3745 derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com www.ihtfp.com Computer and Internet Security Consultant _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp_______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp_______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
signature.asc _______________________________________________ openpgp mailing list openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp
|
|