I agree with Stephen that there is a lot in the current draft labeled
rfc4880bis that we should be able to pretty easily document a rough
consensus for, that is in-charter, and has interoperable
implementations.
We do still need to sort out how we clarify which parts meet those
standards, so we can demonstrate that the re-formed WG can produce the
chartered bis in a collaborative and reasonably prompt way.
Looking forward to working with everyone here on this!
--dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp