Derek Atkins <derek(_at_)ihtfp(_dot_)com> wrote:
> So... IF I read this right, the plan is to start from RFC4880 and then
> re-hash all the discussions we've had in the past decade+ to re-introduce
> changes to it?
I think that the WG needs to go through the major diffs and gain consensus.
I don't think we need to follow all the dead ends, etc. or the
word-smithing.
If there hasn't been any major restructuring of the document, then rfcdiff
ought to do 70% of the work here for us. Someone just has to chop up what
remains, and generate a slide for each part and attach some motivation.
> Or is the plan to start from the current rfc4880bis draft and work from
> there to get it across the finish line?
> The current wording in the charter leads me to the former and not the
> latter process. Can you please confirm?
--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT
consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp