Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return?

Hector Santos wrote:
> +1.  What is more fascinating is "who" convinced John K. we have to 
> worry about banning the decades old term. Hilarious. <g>
I didn't think this discussion was about "banning" anything; it's about 
clear and unambiguous language. In all my standards work over the years, 
I'm hard pressed to think of any point with more confusion and ambiguity 
than the many different kinds of "sender" addresses in Internet E-mail.
<csg>