[Top] [All Lists]

Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return?

2007-10-15 10:01:33

Dave Crocker wrote:
No one is commenting on the alternative I'm suggesting, which is "return address".

It directly maps to its real function and, of course, the term used for postal mail.

And everyone knows you put the return address on the envelope.

It certainly seems sensible; my only hesitation is simply that I haven't heard it used before, despite the wide-spread recognition of the Return-Path header field. I'm certainly in a position to use it and see people's reactions, though.