Re: email-arch: bounce vs... return?

John Leslie wrote:
> > Why not simply use "envelope sender address" as in the DSN RFCs ?
>    I could live with that, too. I tend to think of it as a status
> notification address.

The field does not define a sender.  It defines a receiver.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net