+1
--
ned+ietf-smtp(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
On Aug 16, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Keith Moore wrote:
On Aug 16, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Randall Gellens wrote:
This is something that is so broken I think the best course is to reject
it.
+1
sorry, I misunderstood what was being suggested. if the server gets DATA
followed by a message (or a message fragment) followed by CRLF.CRLF, it should
accept the message (or fragment) and deliver it. no matter what else follows,
or doesn't follow, during the same SMTP session .
+1
Ned
/d
--
Dave Crocker
bbiw.net
via mobile