On 2/14/2021 12:23 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
To the contrary: I am perfectly happy if there is no defined order or
constraint on the order, but I do think it's worth saying that they MAY
appear in either order (i.e., no implementation should ever act on the
order that they happen to appear in).
I'm not a fan of having a spec include language about various things it
is not saying, since the list of such things is infinite. As well,
saying that it is not being covered is a form of covering it. And,
indeed, it invites the reader to find problems with what hasn't been
said. And with what has.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp