We are going in circles here. I have no idea what point you're trying to
make, and I see no chance of arriving at WG consensus.
R's,
John
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/15/2021 4:22 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
I was under the impressiom that our goal here was to document the
long-standing existing practice of software that adds Delvered-To headers.
If that's not the case, we're wasting our time and we should abandon the
draft now.
John, you are some others have been tenaciously insisting that the document
use a term that has no normative value.
Quite a bit earlier today, I offered revised text that eliminates use of the
term and, therefore, eliminates the source of this unnecessary controversy.
Perhaps I missed it, but I haven't not seen anyone respond to that suggested
change, nor to otherwise explain why this bit of bikeshedding has been
necessary.
If you are looking for something to abandon, that would be a more
constructive choice.
d/
Regards,
John Levine, johnl(_at_)taugh(_dot_)com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for
Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp