On 2/15/2021 4:22 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
I was under the impressiom that our goal here was to document the
long-standing existing practice of software that adds Delvered-To headers.
If that's not the case, we're wasting our time and we should abandon the
draft now.
John, you are some others have been tenaciously insisting that the
document use a term that has no normative value.
Quite a bit earlier today, I offered revised text that eliminates use of
the term and, therefore, eliminates the source of this unnecessary
controversy.
Perhaps I missed it, but I haven't not seen anyone respond to that
suggested change, nor to otherwise explain why this bit of bikeshedding
has been necessary.
If you are looking for something to abandon, that would be a more
constructive choice.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
ietf-smtp mailing list
ietf-smtp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-smtp