At 07:33 AM 12/22/00 +0100, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
At 20:17 21/12/2000 -0500, Tony Hansen wrote:
...an IRC server with one channel per working group and BOF, as part of
the "remote participation" effort?
if some organization were to volunteer (and advertise!) this for
Minneapolis, it could be fun to try.....with the number of laptops in the
rooms, we could see an interesting example of simultaneous multilevel
conversations......
My impression is that the primary benefit of real-time chat/instant-msging
in a working group is for PRIVATE exchanges, to consider contributions and
tactics by subsets of participants. One, open channel for the wg won't
help that.
d/
=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker <dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com>
Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464