Re: spam

Simon asks:

How about the cost of legitimate emails that
get filtered and never read.


That's why I don't filter.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: spam, (continued) Re: spam, Scott Francis Re: spam, Theodore Ts'o Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: spam, Valdis . Kletnieks Re: spam, S Woodside major ISP spam count, Dave Aronson Re: spam, Ole J. Jacobsen Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Message not available Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski Re: spam, S Woodside Re: spam, Anthony Atkielski <= The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, shogunx Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, John C Klensin Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Dean Anderson Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, John C Klensin Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Dean Anderson RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\) RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Dean Anderson Re: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Anthony Atkielski RE: The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\)

Previous by Date:	RE: spam, Michel Py
Next by Date:	Re: spam, S Woodside
Previous by Thread:	Re: spam, S Woodside
Next by Thread:	The utilitiy of IP is at stake here, Tony Hain
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]