Re: spam

On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:43:46AM +0200, anthony(_at_)atkielski(_dot_)com said:
> Valdis writes:
>
> > Yes, one vendor has an unfortunate inability
> > to properly follow the MIME spec and drop
> > unrecognized multipart/* to multipart/mixed
> > as required.
> Only one correspondent sends e-mial with this problem.
Only one correspondent that you have received mail from, in this thread.
(Make that two now.)

> > Complain to your vendor or use a RFC-compliant MUA.
> No, I have a better idea:  I'll just trash all the messages from the one
> correspondent that can't join the mainstream.
So your solution is to eliminate the symptom rather than fix the problem?
Nice.
-- 
Scott Francis || darkuncle (at) darkuncle (dot) net
      illum oportet crescere me autem minui

pgpzdUeXQ4LAE.pgp
Description: PGP signature