Well put. Actually I have yet to see ANYONE refute any of the examples
Harald made about inappropriate acts. Nothing but "I don't support this
action universally." THAT sounds a lot like not tolerating disagreement.
-Tom
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of kent crispin
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 10:20 PM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: On PR-actions, signatures and debate
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 06:46:22AM +0200, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:
How? People who cannot tolerate disagreement are very poor at
discussing most things, anyway, since they become upset as soon as
anyone expresses an opinion different from their own.
Toleration of disagreement has almost nothing to do with it.
Instead, it's more a matter of signal to noise ratio on a
limited bandwidth channel. If you fill up a list with
ignorant drivel, people who don't have time to deal with
drivel will go away, leaving the list to those who produce
the drivel.
That's the problem. I've seen it happen many times.
--
Kent Crispin
kent(_at_)songbird(_dot_)com
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf