I strongly prefer the new dinner schedule, and I personally
don't think the theft of cookies is a serious matter.
My feeling is that the refreshments are for _us_, to use for _our_
refreshment,
and if people feel they need a sugar cookie mid-way through a
session, they should be allowed to have one.
If people are coming from outside the meeting to steal our
refreshments, then that's a different matter.
Regards
Marshall
On Mar 28, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
Stewart Bryant wrote:
In Paris, we switched to a late dinner which was necessary in Paris
but we did this in Dallas. Was this a general decision that I
missed?
I prefer dinner from 6 - 8 and a night session where the local
customs
support this. This might also cut down the need for afternoon sugar
consumption.
I normally fly in from Europe and strongly prefer the later dinner -
not because I like late dinners - but because I prefer to have the
sessions before I fall asleep with jet lag.
I heard this comment in Dallas from several people.
It works in reverse when I fly to Europe from California.
(I'm ready to start WG meeting at 4am :-)
I think one's opinion of the new schedule has more to
do with whether you had any night sessions to attend
that your country of origin. If you go to any night
sessions, the old schedule is awful. If not, you don't
care so much.
- Stewart
Andy
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf