There has also been a change in the external factors affecting the urgency
of this work.
At one time the perspective (from at least some of us) has been "We know
we are going to need this stuff sometime in the future".
That perspective has changed to "There are deadlines in place. If we don't
have solutions in place, our existing services are going to be degraded, or
fail".
This will tend to accelerate the rate of completion of the work.
Janet
ken carlberg <carlberg(_at_)g11(_dot_)org(_dot_)uk> wrote on 11/06/2006
12:40:38 PM:
It's not clear whether going on this way will achieve useful results
in a useful amount of time.
the first part of the above is a matter of opinion, which I'll
respect but disagree with.
the second is a red herring. if you wish a more detailed explanation
of the timeline of milestones in IEPREP, I'll be happy to take this
offline with you and the working group chairs. the timeline reflects
poorly on several people (I'll objectively include myself in one
instance) and groups and really doesn't need to be brought up here on
the ietf list.
-ken
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf