ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: how to contact the IETF

2009-02-10 11:33:12
Noel wrote:

Rather than adopt indirect measures (such as requiring people to be 
registered users of a list), I would go straight to the heart of the 
matter, and adopt a formal policy that a mass email campaign should
count _against_ the position taken by that campaign, precisely to
dis-incentivize such campaigns.

A formal policy would require some clear definition of what a "mass email
campaign" is.  How would/could we draw a line and define that term?

Would 100 people sending more or less the same text to a list in less than
24 hours constitute a mass email campaign?  I would say 'yes'.

What about 50 people over 2 days?  Maybe still 'yes'.

How about 20 people over a week, or 10 people recited the same cut and
pasted text during a longer last-call timeframe?

I am not trying to pour cold water on your idea here, but rather I am
wondering how something like this could be formalized, versus handled as an
exceptional case when and if it occurs.

Regards,

Ed  J.


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org 
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Noel
Chiappa
Sent: February 10, 2009 11:21 AM
To: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: jnc(_at_)mercury(_dot_)lcs(_dot_)mit(_dot_)edu
Subject: Re: how to contact the IETF

    > From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(_at_)shinkuro(_dot_)com>

    > This means that those "driving by" have to be tolerated, I think.

Ah, no.

Because if organizing an email campaign works for the FSF, next thing you
know, BigCorp X will be telling everyone who works for it 'we want standard
Q
approved, please send email to the IETF list about that'. If we allow
ourselves to be influenced by a mass email campaign, all we are doing is
virtually guaranteeing that we will get more.  So I think we have an active
interest is responding _negatively_ to such campaigns.

Rather than adopt indirect measures (such as requiring people to be
registered
users of a list), I would go straight to the heart of the matter, and adopt
a
formal policy that a mass email campaign should count _against_ the position
taken by that campaign, precisely to dis-incentivize such campaigns.

        Noel
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>