-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 9/23/09 10:05 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
There is absolutely NO intention or requirement to have any approval
process for agendas or materials by a third party for this (proposed)
meeting.
What do we mean by "third party" here? It seems risky to *not* have some
review process for the slides and oral presentations made during working
group sessions, plenaries, and other official meetings, since those sure
seem to fit the definition of "the Group's activities, visual or audio
presentations at the conference", which are explicitly covered by the
restrictions described in the original email. Perhaps that review would
not be completed by a "third party" but by a team of IETF participants
who have been specially instructed in what does or does not count as
"defamation against the Government of the People's Republic of China",
"disrespect to the Chinese culture", "violat[ion of] any laws of the
People's Republic of China", or "topics regarding human rights or
religion". But to not perform any kind of review seems to open the IETF
to additional risk.
Peter
- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkq7m7IACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwqvQCg6lng0j2dev0k6vbsgldVXcdL
H20An342v0uS0jSNm/u4uHnA74xfH/kf
=rbo4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf