ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Draft IESG Statement on Removal of an Internet-Draft from the IETF Web Site

2012-09-04 06:27:53
in addition
since there is no admissions control on IDs I would think that the IESG would 
want 
to reserve the option to remove an ID that contained clear libel or 
inappropriate 
material (e.g., a pornographic story published as an ID as part of a DoS attack
on the IETF) once the IESG had been given notice of such material

Scott

On Sep 3, 2012, at 9:29 PM, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf(_at_)mit(_dot_)edu> 
wrote:

I strongly urge  the IESG to be significantly more liberal in  the cases
where an I-D will be removed from the archive.

I can think of a number of cases where I'd hope that the IESg would be
cooperative:

1) the IETF recieves a DMCA take-down notice or other instrument
indicating that a third party believes an I-D infringes their copyright.
Forcing such third parties to take the IETF to court does not seem to
benefit the community.

2) An author realizes that an I-D accidentally contains proprietary
information, infringes someone else's copyright, failed to go through
external release processes for the author/editor's organization, etc.
Obviously factors like how long after the I-D is submitted might need to
be considered.


In conclusion, I believe there are a number of cases where the interests
of the community are better served by being able to ask for removal from
the archive. Being able to easily repair mistakes  is likely to
facilitate  more free discussion and more speedy updating of I-Ds.
Yes, I'm aware  that organizations other than the IETF mirror the i-ds
and some of these organizations will be less sympathetic to these
concerns.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>