Btw: RFC3777 3.7.2 seems to define only the criteria to be applied by
NomCom, not for the confirming body.
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:21:41AM -0500, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi Russ,
On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:18 AM, Russ Housley <housley(_at_)vigilsec(_dot_)com>
wrote:
The rest of your question ought to be discussed at the TSVAREA meeting in
Orlando.
I have looked at the agenda of the TSV Area Open Meeting (on Wednesday from
9:00am to 11:30am), and it includes the following item:
"- Open Mic about "Area Expectations for the TSV ADs" -- 60 minutes
The questions we will ask the community:
- what is the existing description we gave to NomCom.
- does the community agree with it?
- is it reasonable, or are we asking too much?"
By "description we gave to the NomCom" do you mean the IESG's list of desired
criteria? Is the NomCom also going to report on the criteria that they came
up with, after considering the IESG's input and whatever input they received
from the community?
I am a little bit confused about the purpose of this meeting. Is it for the
IESG to get feedback on their desired criteria, so that those criteria could
potentially be updated for future years? Or is it for the nomcom to get
further information from the community in order to determine the actual
criteria the nomcom will use (based on input from both the IESG and the
community) to fill the open TSV AD position this year?
I would like to know the purpose of the meeting, because I believe it would
be appropriate for me to participate in a discussion of the former topic, but
not the latter.
Margaret
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eckert(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com
Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture
SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!