On 9/1/13, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf(_at_)elandsys(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi Eduardo,
At 23:19 31-08-2013, Eduardo A. Suarez wrote:
I think both parties have to try to express clearly. Those who do not
have the English as their native language should also try to do so.
Agreed.
What is unbearable to me is that in more than one discussion in a
mailing list someone's opinion is censored because misspell their
ideas or opinions.
I'll try and rephrase the above. In some mailing list discussions a
person's ideas or opinions are ignored because the ideas or opinions
are either not expressed clearly or the ideas or opinions are not
understood.
I always think the problem of not understanding a message in IETF is
not the fault of the transmitter, but it is the receiver's fault. The
receiver SHOULD make more efforts to understand, or send a reply to
request clarifications (specially in IETF WGs when discussing
technical issues). The fault cannot be the used-language or the way
the language is used, but the fault can be low performance of
communication or low purpose of such work at receiver end.
AB