ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Concerns about draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis-05 becoming a Best Current Practice

2013-12-31 07:29:49
On Dec 31, 2013, at 4:12 AM, t.p. <daedulus(_at_)btconnect(_dot_)com> wrote:
Is it Quebecois, Canadian, American, IETFian...  ?  I do not
know and cannot imagine it conveying anything to someone who is new to
the IETF and is not a native English speaker!

It's jargon.   I suspect at this point most native english speakers who read 
IETF documents would understand what it means, but I see no reason to think 
that non-native speakers would, and I assumed it was removed for that reason.   
I think it's fine to leave it out, but would be curious to hear from some 
non-native speakers as to what they think about it.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>