Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring
2014-02-02 10:26:46
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Scott Brim
<scott(_dot_)brim(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Even if it's easy to use (and I'm grateful for enigmail and other
tools), PGP still has the problem of trust dilution.
We can change the trust model.
The PGP model does not meet enterprise needs. If I am sending a mail to an
IETF mailing list it is from me. But if my bank manager is sending me an
email it is coming from the bank not me. So there is a requirement for a
hierarchical trust model to support hierarchical organizations.
The S/MIME model requires trusted third parties but does not give them an
opportunity to add a lot of value unless the network of secure mail users
is a lot larger than it is.
PGP and S/MIME both present a false dichotomy between two trust models when
we actually need both. And saying that it is possible to kinda-sorta use
one to support the use of the other really doesn't fly. Its trying to use a
screwdriver as a hammer.
--
Website: http://hallambaker.com/
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, (continued)
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Randy Bush
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Kent
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Scott Brim
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring,
Phillip Hallam-Baker <=
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Pete Resnick
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Bjoern Hoehrmann
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Brian E Carpenter
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon |
Next by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John Levine |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|