Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring

On 2/1/2014 6:44 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> If someone wanted to propose using PGP or S/MIME (aka CMS) formats
> to provide closer-to-end-to-end confidentiality protection for email
> messages that covered most headers in a way that might get deployment
> then I think that would not match your description. I do suspect
> that that is not likely to happen.
1.  Very much not likely.

2.  It's unrelated to the parts of such a service that appear to be the 
major barriers to large-scale use
3.  It's the wrong level of design discussion, at this stage.


> If OTOH, we spent a lot of time debating email message origin
> authentication then I fully agree with you that we'd just be
> distracting ourselves pointlessly.
+1

d/

--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net