Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring
2014-02-03 13:47:13
On Feb 3, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Dale R. Worley <worley(_at_)ariadne(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Unfortunately, "my bank, my doctor, my brokerage" have all implemented
confidential email, but they are horrible webmail systems. That means
that a considerable amount of the benefit that will be obtainable from
confidential email is already being obtained, making it harder for
proper confidential email to gain acceptance in the market.
Actually it's not being obtained. These systems work quite poorly, and
typically aren't all that secure. I do not think they are widely used by
customers, because their usability is so bad.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Patrik Fältström
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dale R. Worley
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring,
Ted Lemon <=
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Randy Bush
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Brian E Carpenter |
Next by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dale R. Worley |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|