Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring
2014-02-01 20:45:23
On 02/02/2014 02:38 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/1/2014 5:02 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
i support pgp key signing even though pgp and signed mail are not
perfect or make cash fall from the sky. one day at a time.
After twenty years of one day at a time, it's demonstrably not the
vehicle for mass-adoption, nor is there any basis for viewing it as the
foundation of the vehicle.
If you think otherwise, please offer an explanation of how to get from
the small-scale, long-term here to the the necessarily very large-scale
there that we need to reach.
Again, putting energy into PGP or S/MIME -- in anything like their
current form -- incurs extremely expensive opportunity costs for the
IETF community.
You may be right, but I'm not so clear about that, as stated.
If someone wanted to propose using PGP or S/MIME (aka CMS) formats
to provide closer-to-end-to-end confidentiality protection for email
messages that covered most headers in a way that might get deployment
then I think that would not match your description. I do suspect
that that is not likely to happen.
If OTOH, we spent a lot of time debating email message origin
authentication then I fully agree with you that we'd just be
distracting ourselves pointlessly.
S.
d/
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, (continued)
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dale R. Worley
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Randy Bush
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring,
Stephen Farrell <=
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Kent
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Scott Brim
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker |
Next by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|