Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring
2014-02-03 15:59:27
On Feb 3, 2014, at 4:43 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
But there is considerable money available to make them secure.
Sure, but as long as there is no regulatory pressure to do so and the end-user
has to pay for the occasional slip-up, nothing will change. During that
period, the opportunity exists to improve the state of the art in email
security. Should we succeed before the first really big bank security
disaster, it is possible that our solution will appear expedient.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, (continued)
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, John C Klensin
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Patrik Fältström
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dale R. Worley
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Ted Lemon
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring,
Ted Lemon <=
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Theodore Ts'o
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Tobias Gondrom
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Randy Bush
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Farrell
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Dave Crocker
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Stephen Kent
- Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker |
Next by Date: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Agenda, security, and monitoring, Phillip Hallam-Baker |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|