Re: Revision to Note Well

On Feb 6, 2014 8:11 PM, "Warren Kumari" <warren(_at_)kumari(_dot_)net> wrote:

So, how about we simply present *both*.
"Here is an incomplete summary of our IPR stuff, but it should give you

an overview. <click> This is the longer, more detailed and correct version.
It is also posted online and you agreed to it when signing up.

I was thinking this is exactly what I would do.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Revision to Note Well, (continued) Re: Revision to Note Well, Brian E Carpenter Re: Revision to Note Well, ned+ietf Re: Revision to Note Well, Mary Barnes Re: Revision to Note Well, GTW Re: Revision to Note Well, Pete Resnick Re: Revision to Note Well, Paul Hoffman Re: Revision to Note Well, Andrew Sullivan Re: Revision to Note Well, ned+ietf Re: Revision to Note Well, Warren Kumari Re: Revision to Note Well, George Michaelson Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott Brim <= Re: Revision to Note Well, Eggert, Lars Re: Revision to Note Well, Dave Crocker Re: Revision to Note Well, Eggert, Lars Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott O. Bradner Re: Revision to Note Well, Pete Resnick Re: Revision to Note Well, John C Klensin Re: Revision to Note Well, Scott Brim Re: Revision to Note Well, Brian E Carpenter Re: Revision to Note Well, John C Klensin Re: Revision to Note Well (some history), Scott O. Bradner

Previous by Date:	Re: Revision to Note Well, George Michaelson
Next by Date:	Re: [89attendees] IETF 89 London - Tube strikes and Oyster cards, Geoff Mulligan
Previous by Thread:	Re: Revision to Note Well, George Michaelson
Next by Thread:	Re: Revision to Note Well, Eggert, Lars
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]