On 2014-2-6, at 20:35, Brian E Carpenter
<brian(_dot_)e(_dot_)carpenter(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
"If you are aware that any contribution (something written, said, or
discussed in any IETF context) is covered by patents or
patent applications, you must disclose that fact, or not participate in the
discussion."
That is still wrong, because it doesn't distinguish the case of 3rd party
disclosures, which are optional, from 1st party disclosures, which are
mandatory.
Exactly. The new text does not address the issue.
Lars
PS: I'll again point to the IRTF statement, which does: http://irtf.org/ipr.
We'll make it available to the IETF for the low, low price of a round of beers
for the IRSG :-)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail