Section 6:
Nevertheless, while the WG Chairs may delegate a number of tasks to
the Secretary, they maintain the overall responsibility and
accountability over the WG and the decisions and actions that are
taken.
Which is good stuff, like most of the content. I think the
argument is not about the quality of the draft, but about
whether it needs to be a BCP.
If only the "argument" was founded on reading the draft!
Network Working Group M. Vigoureux
Internet Draft Alcatel-Lucent
Intended status: Informational D. King
Expires: May 2015 Old Dog Consulting
C. Pignataro
Cisco Systems, Inc.
November 11, 2014
IETF Working Groups' Secretaries
draft-secretaries-good-practices-07
Who is currently asking for this to be a BCP?
And why are we having that "argument"?
Adrian