ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom ELEGIBILITY]

2015-02-14 20:33:46
The one thing I haven't heard raised is the risk of disengagement by folks who 
only participate and contribute in particular working groups and are not 
"IETFers" in the sense that many of you are. You may find that many remote 
contributors to working groups that are not sponsored by enterprises will find 
other venues to contribute their time and energy. 

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2015 8:10 PM
To: Stephen Farrell
Cc: ietf
Subject: Re: Remote participation fees [Re: Updating BCP 10 -- NomCom
ELEGIBILITY]

I think we ought forget about charging for remote attendance until
remote attendance is much better.

given the current state, we should pay people to endure it.
'participate' is not an appropriate term.  it's like watching tv; though 
today,
your tv listens to you [0].

randy

--

[0] http://www.cnet.com/news/samsung-changes-smarttv-privacy-policy-
in-wake-of-spying-fears/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>