Hello Victor,
I would prefer we improve how we allow remote folks to comment and interact.
People in the room have a strong advantage when it comes to getting to a mic,
and re-inserting themselves if rebutting a comment etc. I think it's here
were the remote folks lack the most participation.
I definitely agree with you on this point. We are trying to propose that *all*
participants make use of a single virtual queue which allows them to take turns
independently from their physical location (local/remote). See “Experiment 2”
section on the remote participation experiment page we published for IETF93:
http://ietf93.conf.meetecho.com/index.php/UMPIRE_Project
<http://ietf93.conf.meetecho.com/index.php/UMPIRE_Project>
We did not eventually run such an experiment in Prague because it was deemed to
be too much disruptive (for local participants). My personal opinion is that,
like with all things, different people have different opinions: when we
proposed the remote queue experiment for Prague, some of the chairs answered
they were not at all in favor of a highly interactive participation by the
remote attendees and they rather preferred to stick to the jabber-based relay
approach.
Regards,
Simon
Oh and yes, all the hallway and beer conversations are sadly missed.
regards,
Victor K
_\\|//_
( O-O )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00~~(_)~~00o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Simon Pietro Romano
Universita' di Napoli Federico II
Computer Engineering Department
Phone: +39 081 7683823 -- Fax: +39 081 7683816
e-mail: spromano(_at_)unina(_dot_)it
<<Molti mi dicono che lo scoraggiamento è l'alibi degli
idioti. Ci rifletto un istante; e mi scoraggio>>. Magritte.
oooO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~( )~~~ Oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
\ ( ( )
\_) ) /
(_/
----
5x1000 AI GIOVANI RICERCATORI
DELL'UNIVERSITÀ DI NAPOLI
Codice Fiscale: 00876220633
www.unina.it/Vademecum5permille