Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input
2016-05-24 09:20:00
It seems like generally most countries have some human rights issues to
complain about. Could you please indicate which countries we would be free
to visit under your proposed rule?
-Ekr
P.S. You might find https://www.hrw.org/ useful here.
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:50 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es> wrote:
In the context:
“IF” we decide not to go to Singapore, then we must avoid going to ANY
country that is against human rights, including death penalty.
Saludos,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Eric Rescorla <ekr(_at_)rtfm(_dot_)com>
Responder a: <ekr(_at_)rtfm(_dot_)com>
Fecha: martes, 24 de mayo de 2016, 15:46
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es>
CC: IETF discussion list <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward
and request for input
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 5:25 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es> wrote:
I will go further:
The same must apply for any country where death penalty is still
applied.
So I take it you oppose meeting in Singapore?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment_in_Singapore
-Ekr
Saludos,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> en nombre de Jordi Palet
Martinez <
jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es>
Responder a: Jordi Palet Martinez
<jordi(_dot_)palet(_at_)consulintel(_dot_)es>
Fecha: martes, 24 de mayo de 2016, 14:22
Para: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path
forward and request for input
+1
Saludos,
Jordi
-----Mensaje original-----
De: ietf <ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org> en nombre de Mikael Abrahamsson
<
swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se>
Organización: People's Front Against WWW
Responder a: <swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se>
Fecha: martes, 24 de mayo de 2016, 14:09
Para: Harish Pillay <harish(_dot_)pillay(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
CC: <ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org>
Asunto: Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path
forward and request for input
On Mon, 23 May 2016, Harish Pillay wrote:
ever used. That is my world experience. When I travel to the US and
I see people carrying weapons, how am I supposed to react/respond?
Let me +1 this here, I am seriously scared for my life whenever I
interact
with law enforcement officers in the US, just from the fact that I know
they have to interact with armed people all the time and have to be
cautious that anyone they interact with has a decent likelyhood to be
armed.
http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-law-basics/states-that-have-stand-your-ground-laws.html
If we can't go to Singapore because they happen to have anti-LGBT laws
on
the books, then I suggest we do not have any further meetings in USA at
all, especially not states that have stand-your-ground laws on their
books.
As opposed to Singapore where anti-LGBT laws aren't really enforced, in
USA these kinds of laws seems to be on the rise instead of things
getting
better.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike(_at_)swm(_dot_)pp(_dot_)se
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the
individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
information, including attached files, is prohibited.
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, (continued)
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic), S Moonesamy
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic), Sandoche Balakrichenan
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic), Vinayak Hegde
- Message not available
- Re: IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input (off-topic), S Moonesamy
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input,
Eric Rescorla <=
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Adam Roach
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] IETF 100, Singapore -- proposed path forward and request for input, Melinda Shore
|
|
|