ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

2017-04-14 13:20:19

Stewart Bryant <stewart(_dot_)bryant(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
    > On 12/04/2017 15:30, Michael Richardson wrote:
    >> Right, so this is why it's better for everyone to be remote.

    > Except that the IETF funding model requires attendees to pay their
    > meeting fee.

That's orthogonal, but a very good point.

And it's why turning SFO into a large "remote hub" (with a fee, and cookies) 
might make sense.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature