Hi Rich,
At 03:34 18-07-2017, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
professional use by technical personnel. Economy and conciseness are
particularly important to those who don't have the privilege of cheap
high-speed connectivity and/or the wealth to pay the usurious rates
charged by some ISPs. As the IETF seeks increased involvement and
diversity around the world (a goal I strongly support) I think it's
critical to ensure that the resources required for participation are
kept minimal.
I did a quick test[1]. The current web site loads in under 5 seconds
while the posh version takes around 20 seconds. I would look at the
revamp in terms of audience [2] and purpose. From a UX perspective,
it would be good if a participant could in one click from the "front
door" reach the datatracker.
In a non-IETF meeting which I attended recently, there were comments
about a topic being too technical [3]. Does the posh web site makes
IETF content less technical and more accessible?
The posh web pages include support for Twitter summary cards [4] and
Facebook OpenGraph tags [5]. Is that necessary?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. Throttled to "slow ADSL".
2. That is covered in the SOW.
3. I would rate the level as well below the average level of an IETF
technical discussion.
4. https://dev.twitter.com/cards/types/summary
5. https://developers.facebook.com/docs/sharing/overview