David W. Tamkin writes on 30 July 1997 at 10:10:27
[...]
Just as another test, I am pointing Reply-To: on this submission to
another account of mine; let's see if it survives the list configuration.
Looks like it survived for me:
------- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) -------
Return-Path: <procmail-request(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE>
Received: from internet.eu.bristol.com by handel.eu.bristol.com
(SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4)
id RAA15935; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 17:44:34 +0100
Received: from bristol.com (bristol.bristol.com) by internet.eu.bristol.com
(5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA13809; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 17:59:53 +0100
Received: from Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE by bristol.com (5.0/SMI-4.1)
id AA13095; Wed, 30 Jul 97 11:41:17 EDT
Received: (from lists(_at_)localhost) by Campino.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE
(RBI-Z-5/8.6.12) id RAA04176; Wed, 30 Jul 1997 17:32:48 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: campino.informatik.rwth-aachen.de: lists set sender
to procmail-request(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de using -f
Message-Id: <m0wtaOS-000jzhC(_at_)miso(_dot_)wwa(_dot_)com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-Message-Id: <"QkynMC.A.n5.gm13z"@campino>
X-Mailing-List: <procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de>
archive/latest/12787
X-Loop: procmail(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: procmail-request(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
content-length: 2445
From: dattier(_at_)wwa(_dot_)com (David W. Tamkin)
Resent-From: procmail(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
Subject: trying to preset Reply-To:
To: procmail(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE (Procmail Mailing List)
Reply-To: dattier(_at_)ripco(_dot_)com
In-Reply-To: <199707292350(_dot_)TAA02579(_at_)kira(_dot_)peak(_dot_)org> from
"Timothy J Luoma" at Jul 29, 97 07:50:06 pm
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 17:32:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 10:10:27 -0500 (CDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
[...]
------- end -------
Likewise, I think this message should have a Reply-To: header to
J_Daniel_Smith(_at_)PlanetAll(_dot_)com (although done by a completely different
means - I want all non-company mail routed through a "for life" email
address; I've wrapped "sendmail" with a simple "procmail" recipe to
achieve this).
Dan
------------------- message is author's opinion only ------------------
J. Daniel Smith <DanS(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com>
http://www.bristol.com/~DanS
Bristol Technology B.V. +31 33 450 50 50, ...51 (FAX)
Amersfoort, The Netherlands {info,jobs}(_at_)bristol(_dot_)com