At 10:35 AM 7/30/97 -0500, David W. Tamkin wrote:
Or did neither Sean nor Timothy get the promised Reply-To: line onto their
submissions in the first place?
The past three of my posts (plus now this message) have all contained the
additional header. Don't know why you're not seeing it. Perhaps it is a
non-standard mailer on your end? <grin>
From my first post with it:
Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 02:15:25 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Authentication-Warning: campino.informatik.rwth-aachen.de: lists set
sender to procmail-request(_at_)informatik(_dot_)rwth-aachen(_dot_)de using -f
Message-Id:
<3(_dot_)0(_dot_)1(_dot_)32(_dot_)19970729170532(_dot_)007dcbb0(_at_)ix15(_dot_)ix(_dot_)netcom(_dot_)com>
Reply-To: procmail(_at_)Informatik(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
Organization: Professional Software Engineering
---
Please DO NOT carbon me on list replies. I'll get my copy from the list.
Sean B. Straw / Professional Software Engineering
Post Box 2395 / San Rafael, CA 94912-2395