On 15 Feb, Tim Bass wrote:
|
| Sean,
|
| I am going to reply to your antisocial and rude message.
|
| [snip unwarranted personal invective]
You need to re-read both Sean's post and your own. If your big enough
and capable of objectivity (and a little self examination) you'll see
that both were tough. Only one was rude and anti-social and it wasn't
Sean's. And since an attack on me is probably next, let me just make
this clear for the record.
I sometimes wish that Sean were a little easier on people. But that is
ONLY a question of style, not substance, and it's NOT my call to make.
In the end, he offers great amounts of substantive help, all at a
significant cost to his time, and receives a lot of unwarranted
personal abuse because small minded people get their shorts in a knot
over style.
Here's the top 3 posters to this list for the years 2001 and 2002:
2001
319 pse-l(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org
385 guenther(_at_)gac(_dot_)edu
386 dattier(_at_)ripco(_dot_)com
2002
204 guenther(_at_)gac(_dot_)edu
247 dattier(_at_)ripco(_dot_)com
546 pse-l(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org
You were out of line, not him. If that means I don't get to go to
unix.com either ... I guess I'll live.
--
Email address in From: header is valid * but only for a couple of days *
This is my reluctant response to spammers' unrelenting address harvesting
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail