Do show me an example of the netiquette which suggests bottom-posting, and
I'll bet I can find another which suggests top-posting. If you are
following a thread, why would you want to read the same text every time?
Instead, you need ONLY read the new information, and you can always scroll
down for context should you require it.
I really enjoy the random reference to Superman and to AOL in the same
sentence. They go together like motor oil and cheeze whiz.
Fuzzy
--
Quidquid Latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.
Vir sapit qui pauca loquitur.
Cras amet qui numquam amavit, quique amavit cras plus amet.
Uno itinere non potest perveniri ad tam grande secretum.
On Tue, 29 Apr 2003, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
You should be on TV, as should anyone able to answers before they are
asked and probably leap tall buildings with a single bound (you may not
be old enough to recognize this or to recognize the long standing
etiquette for mail replies established before aol).
But have a good day, anyway.
* Fuzzy Logic <fuzzman(_at_)m-net(_dot_)arbornet(_dot_)org> [04-29-03 12:30]:
Somehow, I don't think top-posting is the end of the world, and many of us
prefer it. Go ahead and check my headers. I'm using Pine where it is
configurable, and yet I still use top-post. Go figure.
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail