Procmail (date)

Procmail (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

August 17, 2015

Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Erik Christiansen, 08:50

August 16, 2015

Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Ian Zimmerman, 11:09
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Eric Smith, 10:09
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Eric Smith, 10:09
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:03
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Ian Zimmerman, 09:57
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Eric Smith, 09:44
Re: egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Ian Zimmerman, 09:29
egrep matches, but procmail recipe not, Eric Smith, 04:15

August 11, 2015

Re: Command died with status 134, Eric Smith, 00:37

August 10, 2015

Re: Command died with status 134, Ian Zimmerman, 19:08
Re: Command died with status 134, Eric Smith, 16:26

August 09, 2015

Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:18
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ian Zimmerman, 13:58
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:38
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:31
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, John Levine, 12:37
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ian Zimmerman, 12:26
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, John Levine, 12:19
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Patrick Shanahan, 12:13
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ian Zimmerman, 11:40
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Alan Clifford, 11:28
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, @lbutlr, 10:09
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, wolfgang, 10:05
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Ian Zimmerman, 09:58
Re: environment passed from sendmail?, Alan Clifford, 07:33
environment passed from sendmail?, Ian Zimmerman, 01:51

August 05, 2015

Re: Command died with status 134, Ian Zimmerman, 19:44
Re: Command died with status 134Reply-To:, @lbutlr, 16:38
Re: Command died with status 134Reply-To:, Eric Smith, 09:15
Re: Command died with status 134Reply-To:, @lbutlr, 09:04
Command died with status 134Reply-To:, Eric Smith, 02:19