It's also good to remember... This website caches your DNS entry. So if you
accidentally mess-up the value, then correct it, it
will take time for the DNS to re-query the authoritative nameserver.
I know I have one domain in the registry with errors right now because of the
cache. I fixed the others before adding them in
though.
This probably won't matter near as much in a few days, once the system has had
time to evaluate more entries, and caches expire....
But, now I would imagine it can make up a fair amount of those failures.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Carver (me)" <leeca(_at_)pnambic(_dot_)com>
To: <spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] about the SPF registry
Is a plot (graph) of the SPF roll-call available?
It would be fun to see the numbers ramp up, and good marketing too.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡