spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: A heads-up on defaults

2003-12-16 15:55:49
Meng Weng Wong wrote:
Mail::SPF::Query understands the default=* "modifiers"; would it be
easier to just have your thing support them too?

Then you could break out "errors" vs "old-style records".

Actually these are flagging as errors because they don't have an 'all' term (is that correct behaviour?). The parse will just assume that "default=deny" is a modifer it's not familiar with, and raise a warning.

If 'all' isn't required I can drop it to a warning, although that's starting to cover rather a multitude of sins. I may have to increase the number of levels...

I'll post the list of (errors, warnings, notes) to the -devel list tomorrow. There's quite a few of them...

Anyhow, I need to go hit the sack now. Suggestions will be processed in the morning.
        
        Wechsler

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>